NTP patent in Blackberry case gets final rejection

In the latest twist in the five-year patent dispute between BlackBerry device maker Research in Motion Ltd. and patent-holding company NTP Inc., the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Wednesday issued a final rejection for one of the five patents in NTP’s suit against RIM.

NTP can now appeal the decision to the Patent Office Board or a federal court. NTP lead counsel James Wallace of Wiley, Rein & Fielding LLP was not available for comment. A document regarding the final rejection was posted at the Patent Office Web site and RIM also announced that decision in a press release.

The dispute began in 2001, when NTP charged in a lawsuit that it owns the patents on wireless technology used in RIM’s popular BlackBerry devices and server software. In August 2003, a U.S. court awarded NTP US$53.7 million in damages and ordered an injunction that would prevent RIM from making, selling or servicing its devices and server software in the United States. That injunction, however, was stayed while RIM appealed the decision.

While the case has continued to take several twists and turns through the courts, the USPTO has continued to review the validity of NTP’s patents. The patent office has already rejected most of NTP’s patents on a preliminary basis.

Meanwhile, NTP and RIM this Friday will appear in a hearing before U.S. District Court Judge James Spencer, who will decide whether to enforce the injunction of BlackBerry sales in the U.S. The district court hearing the case is in eastern Virginia.

RIM, however, has said that even if an injunction is enforced, it has developed software that would enable it to continue to offer its wireless e-mail service to BlackBerry users.

Shop ▾
arrow up Amazon Shop buttons are programmatically attached to all reviews, regardless of products' final review scores. Our parent company, IDG, receives advertisement revenue for shopping activity generated by the links. Because the buttons are attached programmatically, they should not be interpreted as editorial endorsements.

Subscribe to the Best of Macworld Newsletter