Lab report: 2011 MacBook Pro benchmark results

The benchmark results for Apple's latest MacBook Pros are in—and they’re impressive. In testing conducted by Macworld Lab, the laptops released Thursday turned in Speedmark scores between 13 and 53 percent faster than the systems they replace.

Apple overhauled its MacBook Pro offerings with new processors, new graphics, and a new peripheral connector. The new lineup consists of two 13-inch models, two 15-inch models (down from three in the previous generation) and one 17-inch model. The 13-inch models come with Intel’s integrated HD Graphics 3000, and either a 2.3GHz dual-core Core i5 processor and a 5400-rpm 320GB hard drive for $1199, or a 2.7GHz dual-core Core i7 processor with a 5400-rpm 500GB hard drive for $1499. Both 15-inch models come with Intel’s integrated HD Graphics 3000. The $1799 configuration sports a 2GHz quad-core Core i7 processor, a 5400-rpm 500GB drive, and a discrete AMD Radeon HD 6490M graphics processor with 256MB of GDDR5 video memory, while the $2199 offering features a 2.2GHz quad-core Core i7 processor, a 5400-rpm 750GB drive, and a discrete AMD Radeon HD 6750M graphics processor with 1GB of GDDR5 video memory. The $2499 17-inch model has the same specs as the $2199 15-inch model. All MacBook Pros have 4GB of 1333MHz DDR3 memory.

The only external clue to any changes comes in the form of a tiny icon near what was the Mini DisplayPort connector. It’s now the Thunderbolt port, a new technology that Intel developed with input from Apple. The port looks like the Mini DisplayPort and you can still connect a LED Cinema Display or Mini DisplayPort adapter, but you’ll also be able to connect up to six peripheral devices, such as hard drives. Thunderbolt-equipped products have been announced, but they are have not started shipping, so unfortunately, we are unable to test the speed of the Thunderbolt connection in this round of testing.

What we can test is the effect the new processors and graphics have on performance. Intel Core i series processors (known by the code-name Sandy Bridge), are found inside every new MacBook Pro. With the processor, cache, graphics, and memory controller all residing on the same die, these Core i5 and Core i7 processors helped propel the new MacBook Pros well past their predecessors in CPU performance.

The integrated graphics processor in each MacBook Pro has also changed, with Intel’s HD 3000 graphics installed across the line. In the last generation of MacBook Pros, Apple used Intel’s integrated HD graphics only in the higher-end models that had a second, higher-powered GPU, the Nvidia GeForce GT 330M, for graphically intensive applications. Apple didn’t think the older Intel HD graphics were powerful enough to be the only option in those older 13-inch models, which couldn’t support two graphics chips, so the company stuck with Core 2 Duo processors and used Nvidia’s integrated GeForce 320M graphics. With the new HD Graphics 3000, Apple found the improved performance good enough to finally invite the 13-inch models into the Core i era.

Speedmark 6.5 results:
2011 MacBook Pros

Speedmark 6.5
Score
13" MacBook Pro 2.3GHz Core i5 dual-core 140
13" MacBook Pro 2.7GHz Core i7 dual-core 155
15" MacBook Pro 2.0GHz Core i7 quad-core 175
15" MacBook Pro 2.2GHz Core i7 quad-core 206
17" MacBook Pro 2.2GHz Core i7 quad-core 210
13" MacBook Pro 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo 106
13" MacBook Pro 2.66GHz Core 2 Duo 137
15" MacBook Pro 2.4GHz Core i5 dual core 132
15" MacBook Pro 2.66GHz Core i7 dual-core 151
17" MacBook Pro 2.53GHz Core i5 dual-core 137
13" MacBook Air 1.83GHz Core 2 Duo (256GB SSD) 108
MacBook 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo (2GB RAM) 99
21.5" iMac 3.06GHz Core i3 dual-core 174
27" iMac 2.8GHz Core i5 quad-core 196

Higher scores are better. Reference models in italics. Best result in bold.

13-inch MacBook Pros

Overall, the new entry-level 13-inch MacBook Pro, with a Speedmark 6.5 score of 141 was 35 percent faster than the 106 score by the 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo model it replaces. The new system was faster at just about everything, except for our Call of Duty tests, which was only able to display 26 frames per second versus the 33 frames displayed by the older model with Nvidia graphics. The lower game performance will probably be seen by many as a reasonable price to pay for the increased performance found in other applications. The biggest leap was in our iTunes AAC-to-MP3 encoding test, which was 57 percent faster on the new system. Our Handbrake test finished 47 percent faster on the newer system than on the one it replaces.

The 13-inch 2.7GHz Core i7 MacBook Pro’s improvement was less dramatic, scoring only a 13-percent gain over the model it replaces, a 2.66GHz Core 2 Duo system. The new system was 36 percent faster in our iTunes test and 28 percent faster in our Handbrake test. Again, Call of Duty was 26 percent (7 frames per second) faster on the older Nvidia-powered 13-inch model.

We found the entry-level 13-inch MacBook Pro to be 31 percent faster overall than the 13-inch 1.83GHz Core 2 Duo MacBook Air. The Pro was much faster in processor intensive tasks, but the MacBook Air was much faster at duplicating and unzipping files, thanks to the flash storage. The Air’s Nvidia graphics were also faster than the Intel HD Graphics 3000.

15- and 17-inch MacBook Pros

The 15-inch 2.0GHz quad core Core i7 MacBook Pro was 33 percent faster overall than the 15-inch 2.4GHz dual core Core i5 system introduced last April. The new MacBook Pro’s Handbrake time was 51 percent faster than the older system, while its iTunes encoding times were 24 percent faster. Duplicating and Unzipping files didn’t see much improvement between the systems, and Call of Duty framerate was slower than the older system.

The 15-inch 2.2GHz quad-core Core i7 MacBook Pro and the 17-inch model that has similar specifications were finally able to outperform their predecessors in game performance, thanks to the Radeon HD 6750M graphics with 1GB of dedicated video memory. The new models were able display 31 percent more frames per second than the 15- and 17-inch models with Nvidia GeForce GT 330M graphics that they replace. Overall, the new 15-inch 2.2GHz quad-core Core i7 MacBook Pro was 38 percent faster than last year’s fastest 15-inch model and the new 17-inch model was 53 percent faster than last year’s largest Mac laptop.

iMacs

What’s more interesting was how well the new MacBook Pros compare performance-wise to the iMacs. The new 2.0GHz 15-inch MacBook Pro beat out the entry-level 3.06GHz dual core Core i3 iMac by one Speedmark point, with Call of Duty and disk-intensive tasks running faster on the iMac and processor-intensive tasks running faster on the MacBook Pro. The 15- and 17-inch 2.2GHz MacBook Pros were about 7 percent faster overall than the high-end standard configuration iMac, a 27-inch model with a 2.8GHz quad-core Core i5 processor. The three Macs scored identically in our Aperture import test, as well as our Photoshop and iMovie export tests. Call of Duty was 9 percent faster on the iMac.

Speedmark 6.5 individual application test results:
2011 MacBook Pros

Duplicate
1GB
File
Zip
2GB
folder
Unzip
2GB
folder
Pages '09
Open
Word Doc
13" MacBook Pro 2.3GHz Core i5 dual-core 29 181 65 83
13" MacBook Pro 2.7GHz Core i7 dual-core 27 158 59 76
15" MacBook Pro 2.0GHz Core i7 quad-core 31 184 64 81
15" MacBook Pro 2.2GHz Core i7 quad-core 23 159 51 77
17" MacBook Pro 2.2GHz Core i7 quad-core 24 159 49 76
13" MacBook Pro 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo 32 239 69 115
13" MacBook Pro 2.66GHz Core 2 Duo 25 174 51 80
15" MacBook Pro 2.4GHz Core i5 dual core 32 211 68 82
15" MacBook Pro 2.66GHz Core i7 dual-core 29 190 65 80
17" MacBook Pro 2.53GHz Core i5 dual-core 28 198 60 74
13" MacBook Air 1.83GHz Core 2 Duo, 256GB SSD 13 262 39 118
MacBook 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo (2GB RAM) 32 238 68 106
21.5" iMac 3.06GHz Core i3 19 166 42 77
27" iMac 2.8GHz Core i5 quad-core 21 170 44 76

Results are in seconds. Lower results are better. Reference models in italics. Best result in bold.

Speedmark 6.5 individual application test results:
2011 MacBook Pros

iTunes 10
AAC to
MP3
encode
Import
movie
archive to
iMovie '09
iMovie '09
export to
iTunes 10
for iPhone
Call of
Duty 4
framerate
13" MacBook Pro 2.3GHz Core i5 dual-core 97 114 88 26
13" MacBook Pro 2.7GHz Core i7 dual-core 85 101 80 27
15" MacBook Pro 2.0GHz Core i7 quad-core 94 77 67 51
15" MacBook Pro 2.2GHz Core i7 quad-core 83 70 56 81
17" MacBook Pro 2.2GHz Core i7 quad-core 82 69 54 81
13" MacBook Pro 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo 226 103 121 33
13" MacBook Pro 2.66GHz Core 2 Duo 132 99 85 34
15" MacBook Pro 2.4GHz Core i5 dual core 123 87 101 63
15" MacBook Pro 2.66GHz Core i7 dual-core 106 86 88 62
17" MacBook Pro 2.53GHz Core i5 dual-core 118 87 102 62
13" MacBook Air 1.83GHz Core 2 Duo (256GB SSD) 259 103 139 40
MacBook 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo (2GB RAM) 255 108 120 33
21.5" iMac 3.06GHz Core i3 95 103 69 78
27" iMac 2.8GHz Core i5 quad-core 95 78 56 88

Call of Duty 4 results are based on framerate; higher results are better. All other test results in the above chart are in seconds; lower results are better. References models in italics. Best result in bold.

Speedmark 6.5 individual application test results:
2011 MacBook Pros

iPhoto '09
200 JPEG
import
Photoshop
CS5 action
HandBrake
0.9.4
encode
Cinebench
R11.5
graphics
13" MacBook Pro 2.3GHz Core i5 dual-core 45 60 404 11
13" MacBook Pro 2.7GHz Core i7 dual-core 43 57 359 11
15" MacBook Pro 2.0GHz Core i7 quad-core 43 69 238 21
15" MacBook Pro 2.2GHz Core i7 quad-core 52 55 220 35
17" MacBook Pro 2.2GHz Core i7 quad-core 39 57 216 36
13" MacBook Pro 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo 61 71 760 11
13" MacBook Pro 2.66GHz Core 2 Duo 44 66 495 11
15" MacBook Pro 2.4GHz Core i5 dual core 61 65 484 16
15" MacBook Pro 2.66GHz Core i7 dual-core 44 58 422 16
17" MacBook Pro 2.53GHz Core i5 dual-core 60 68 464 16
13" MacBook Air 1.83GHz Core 2 Duo (256GB SSD) 65 75 950 13
MacBook 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo (2GB RAM) 68 95 762 11
21.5" iMac 3.06GHz Core i3 35 60 405 25
27" iMac 2.8GHz Core i5 quad-core 36 55 256 32

CineBench R11.5 Graphics results are a score; higher results are better. All other test results in the above chart are in seconds; lower results are better. Reference models in italics. Best result in bold.

At a Glance
1 2 Page 1
Notice to our Readers
We're now using social media to take your comments and feedback. Learn more about this here.