Review: Four stylish on-ear headphones worth hearing

At a Glance
  • V-moda Crossfade M-80 headphones

    TechHive Rating
  • Bowers & Wilkins (B&W) P3 Headphones

    TechHive Rating
  • RHA SA950i headphones

    TechHive Rating
  • Skullcandy Navigator headphones

    TechHive Rating
Page 2 of 2

Bowers & Wilkins P3 Headphones

B&W’s P5 has been a hit critical and (as best I can tell) commercial hit. Its design, comfort, and sound make it a good value at $300, but that price tag is too big for some consumers to swallow.

The P3 aims to make a good amount of the P5’s design and quality available at a lower price—specifically, $200. To achieve that price, the company had to surrender the P5’s luxurious leather in favor of attractive cloth and rubberized plastic. On the other hand, unlike the P5, the P3 is available in blue, as well as black and white versions. The size of the P3’s earpieces is smaller, as is the size of the drivers within the earpieces. However, the P3 retains the P5’s overall look, chrome and brushed-metal highlights, removable magnetic earpads, and removable cable with three-button remote and microphone (an audio-only cable bundled with headset). As with the P5, each cable plug is cleverly hidden behind the earpieces, with the cable wound inside to provide strain relief. B&W includes a two-year warranty.

To use a car analogy, the P3 is like buying the base model of a car instead of one that offers a higher trim level, with cloth seats instead of leather, and with a few luxury touches omitted. The P3 still looks great, though not as spectacular as the P5, and the earpads are soft and comfortable. Large-headed buyers should exercise caution: Like the Navigator, the P3 would benefit from a headband with more padding. Also, whereas the P5 relies on a single cable that attaches to the left earpiece, the P3 uses a split cable that attaches to both earpieces (via mono 2.5mm plugs); I find that two-sided cables tend to get in my way more than a single-sided cable.

In an improvement on the P5, the P3 folds into a smaller package, though the P3’s earpieces don’t swivel to the degree that the P5’s do, making the P3 slightly less comfortable to wear. I liked the P3’s rigid clamshell carrying case, which offers more protection than the P5’s quilted carrying bag. Like other B&W models, the P3’s remote and microphone module is perfectly cylindrical except for a depression that indicates the location of the center button. This makes the center button easy to press, but it’s also hard to determine the front of the volume up and down buttons, making them hard to press.

Moving directly from the Navigator to the P3, I noticed improvement in the treble frequencies, which also do a better job of standing up to the P3’s bass. However, though the P3 dials back the bass in comparison to the Navigator, the bass is still excessive and a little sloppy. As a result, the P3’s midrange frequencies, which are recessed relative to the low and high frequencies—are largely overwhelmed by the low frequencies. Overall, I liked the P3’s sound better than the Navigator’s, but I still found listening to the P3 for long periods of time to be fatiguing.

I borrowed a friend’s P5 headset to assess how it sounded next to the P3—and using the P5 after the P3 was a revelation. Not only did I get the luxurious feel of the P5’s leather, but the sound was vastly superior. Bass was tighter and extended deeper; high frequencies were more detailed, and the P5’s lovely midrange was clearly audible against the bass. The P5’s sound isn’t strictly neutral (it still has slightly exaggerated bass), and it isn’t the last word in detail (it errs on the warm side), but it’s well-balanced and exceedingly pleasant to listen to, a quality that the P3 is somewhat deficient in.

V-Moda Crossfade M–80 v2

V-Moda made its name with bass-heavy, in-ear headphones, and the company’s older $200 Crossfade LP is a full-size offering that continues that bass-heavy sound signature. In making a more portable version of the Crossfade LP, however, the company signaled that the resulting Crossfade M–80 targeted audiophiles.

The M–80 (as well as the V–80, a version featuring branding and design touches from HBO’s True Blood television show) has remarkably solid metal, plastic, and cloth construction. The design is much more angular, industrial, and edgy than any of the other headphones here; it won’t be to everyone’s taste, but I think it looks great. The headphones are available in shadow (black/dark gray) and pearl (white/light gray) color schemes. Notably, you can customize the outside of each earpiece with interchangeable “shield” faceplates that are available in various of colors, with optional text or logos (including the option to submit a custom logo). You get an additional pair of shields free if you purchase the M–80 directly from V-Moda, or you can purchase them later for $25 per pair.

V-Moda includes two cloth-wrapped and Kevlar-reinforced cables in the package: Each has an inline microphone, but one of them features an Apple-style three-button inline remote and a microphone, while the other uses a generic one-button inline remote for use with non-Apple devices. The current version of the M–80 (v2) separates the microphone from the remote module, positioning the microphone higher—and closer to your mouth—with the remote lower on the cable to make it easier to see and use. Either cable attaches to the left earpiece via a 3.5mm miniplug. The company sells replacements for the three-button cable for $20, or the one-button version for $15; an audio-only cable (with no microphone or remote) is available for $12.

Also included with the M–80 is a hard-plastic “Exoskeleton” case whose design suggests a Klingon forehead or the boney torso of Ridley Scott’s Alien. Beyond its sci-fi trappings, the case features interior elastic bands for holding cables. V-Moda offers a two-year warranty against manufacturing defects, along with a 50-percent discount on a replacement headset in the event of user-inflicted damage or out-of-warranty failure.

Though the M–80’s earpads don’t feel as luxurious as the P5’s, or even the Navigator’s, I found these headphones to be the most comfortable overall. As before, my big head caused comfort problems during longer listening sessions, in part due to the pressure of the earpieces, but that pressure also yielded impressive sound isolation—and the M–80’s metal construction enables you to bend the headphone a bit to improve comfort. (Again, I would like to see more padding in the headband.) The cables give the impression of quality, though they’re heavier than the other cables here. The company’s three-button remote is a little bulky but easy to use.

Sonically, I found the M–80 to be the most impressive headphone of the bunch. There’s a bit of bass emphasis—V-Moda’s “modern-audiophile” sound is purposely designed to provide a bit of extra kick—but the bass sounds tight for a sealed headphone, and it doesn’t interfere with the midrange and treble frequencies. Those frequencies are impressive, too, as the M–80 provided more detail than B&W’s P5 and made me feel more involved in the music. On the other hand, some listeners may prefer the P5’s smoothness, and the M–80 did have a bit more of the closed-in sound characteristic of sealed headphones. The M–80 isn’t the best pair of headphones I’ve used, but it’s the best pair of sealed, supra-aural headphones I’ve tried.

Speak into the mic

A microphone often seems like an afterthought in full-size headphones; but since these models are designed with portability in mind, I tested each model’s inline mic. Ultimately, each works fine for occasional phone calls, though the none sounded as good as the microphone on Apple’s pack-in EarPods. The Aviator’s microphone sounded somewhat distant, and the V-Moda M–80’s sounded particularly distant. The P3’s microphone came closest to matching the excellent performance of the EarPods, followed by the SA950i.

Bottom line

Among the four models here, I found two hits and two misses. The RHA SA950i isn’t perfect, but it looks and sounds great for $60. The Skullcandy Navigator also looks great, but only committed bass heads should choose it over the SA950i. For its part, the Bowers & Wilkins P3 looks great but sounds crowded, closed-in, and overly bassy; I recommend stepping down to the SA950i or up to the V-Moda M–80 or over to the previously reviewed B&W P5. As for the M–80, it sounds fantastic and its build quality is impressive. In fact, though some people may prefer the smooth sound of B&W’s P5, I think the M–80 delivers better audio for $100 less. (At a street price of $150, the M–80 is a spectacular bargain.)

This story, "Review: Four stylish on-ear headphones worth hearing" was originally published by TechHive.

To comment on this article and other Macworld content, visit our Facebook page or our Twitter feed.
At a Glance
  • TechHive Rating
  • TechHive Rating
  • TechHive Rating
  • TechHive Rating
Related:
| 1 2 Page 2
Notice to our Readers
We're now using social media to take your comments and feedback. Learn more about this here.