Tested: 6 travel routers

TP-Link TL-WR710N travel router review: Featurific, but lacking in performance

TP-Link TL-WR710N travel router
At a Glance
  • TP-Link TL-WR710N 150Mbps Wireless N Mini Pocket Router

    Macworld Rating

    If you like fiddling with knobs (in software, that is), the TP-Link TL-WR710N gives you plenty to do. It has a solid feature set, but its performance lags the offerings from D-Link and Netgear. It's also...

Tested: 6 travel routers

Show More

TP-Link’s TL-WR710N travel router is very similar to Netgear’s PR2000 Trek, but in a slightly smaller form factor. Like the Trek, it can plug straight into an electrical socket, it has a USB 2.0 Type A port for sharing storage, and it has two ethernet ports. Unlike the Trek, it supports only one 150Mbps spatial stream in 802.11n mode (on the 2.4GHz frequency band); and since it doesn’t have a micro USB port, it must be plugged into a wall socket (unless you travel with an extension cord, I suppose).

The TL-WR710N can operate in one of five modes. In wireless router mode, you connect the Pocket Router to a DSL or cable modem and clients connect to the router wirelessly or via an ethernet cable plugged into its LAN port. In wireless access-point mode, the router connects to a hardwired network that has Internet access and creates a wireless network that clients can join to reach the Internet. In this case, the second LAN port can support one hardwired client (or more if you connect an ethernet switch).

In WISP mode, the Pocket Router establishes a wireless connection to a Wi-Fi hotspot and shares that Internet access on its own wireless network (as well as through its LAN port). And in repeater mode, you can use the Pocket Router to extend the range of a wireless network by establishing a wireless connection to another wireless router or wireless access point. It will then rebroadcast that signal.

Travel router benchmarks

The travel routers from D-Link and Netgear deliver much higher performance than the TP-Link TL-WR710N. Then again, they're also more expensive. 

The TL-WR710N comes with preconfigured security, with its default SSID, wireless password, and admin login and password printed on the side of the device (albeit in itty-bitty print). Like TP-Link’s TL-MR3040, the Pocket Router supports up to WPA/WPA2 security with a RADIUS server. A single unlabeled LED (on the side facing out when the router is plugged into a wall socket report) glows blue when the device is working properly and blinks when the device is booting or when an ethernet cable or USB device is connecting to the router. Not terribly informative. This router doesn’t have a WPS button, either, but it does support the feature in software.

You can share files stored on a USB hard drive by plugging it into the Pocket Router, and TP-Link provides a media server for streaming music, video, and photos (but the server is not DLNA certified). You can also establish user accounts for file sharing, to restrict access and control whether users can read and write files or only read them.

When I measured TCP throughput, the Pocket Router finished last overall. When the wireless client was in the same room as the router, separated by nine feet, I saw TCP throughput of just 15.4Mbps. When I moved the client to the kitchen, 20 feet away with one insulated wall in between, the Pocket Router’s throughput dropped only slightly, to 14.6 Mbps. As with TP-Link's other travel router, the TL-WR710N couldn't reach the MacBook Pro when I placed it in my home office, 65 feet from the router and separated by several insulated walls. 

Would I buy one?  

The TP-Link TL-MR3040 and the Netgear Trek PR2000 are street-priced about the same. The TP-Link’s user interface exposes more functions than the Netgear’s does, but the Netgear delivers much higher performance.

To comment on this article and other Macworld content, visit our Facebook page or our Twitter feed.
At a Glance
  • Macworld Rating

    If you like fiddling with knobs (in software, that is), the TP-Link TL-WR710N gives you plenty to do. It has a solid feature set, but its performance lags the offerings from D-Link and Netgear. It's also very inexpensive.

    Pros

    • Versatile operational modes
    • Dual Ethernet ports
    • USB port for file sharing, media streaming, or device charging

    Cons

    • Much slower than the D-Link DIR-510L and Netgear Trek
    • Doesn’t support cellular USB modems
    • No WPS button
Notice to our Readers
We're now using social media to take your comments and feedback. Learn more about this here.