Internet file swappers worried about being sued by the Recording Industry Association of America Inc. (RIAA) can now find out whether the industry association has their number — their IP (Internet Protocol) number, that is.
Web-based tool provided by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) gives file swappers the ability to check their home IP address or file sharing service user name against a list of addresses and names disclosed in hundreds of subpoena filed by the RIAA to ISPs (Internet service providers).
The tool was unveiled on Friday and consists of a Web page with a field into which visitors can type a user name from file sharing services such as Kazaa and Grokster, or the IP address of a system used to swap files.
That page is linked to a database containing file swapper information culled from RIAA subpoenas, according to Fred von Lohmann, senior intellectual property attorney at the EFF.
The RIAA did not respond to requests for comment.
Visitors who enter a name or address that is on the list receive a link to an electronic copy of the actual subpoena, he said.
The new tool is a way to give file sharers who are being targeted a head start on challenging the subpoenas, von Lohmann said.
Those whose names are not in the list receive “peace of mind” that they are not being pursued, the EFF said.
Still, because of delays in processing the large volume of subpoenas being issued by the RIAA, there is a lag between the number of subpoenas submitted by the RIAA and the number disclosed to the public and in the EFF database, von Lohmann said.
The EFF believes that the RIAA has subpoenaed ISPs for information on almost 1,000 file swappers so far, but only around 300 are accessible to the public, he said.
In addition, the RIAA is adding new subpoenas each day, meaning that file swappers should take only small comfort if their user name or IP address don’t match those in the database, von Lohmann said.
In June, the RIAA said that it was beginning to gather evidence for use in what it said would be “thousands of lawsuits” against individual music swappers.
At the time, the group said that it would use software that can scan peer-to-peer networks to gather evidence that would be used as the basis for the lawsuits.
While it is too early to discern a pattern in the RIAA’s subpoenas, they typically name between five and ten copyrighted songs that the group owns and that are not authorized for online distribution, von Lohmann said.
Users who are hosting files rather than downloading them are the target, and the RIAA may be going after so-called “supernodes” on peer to peer networks like Kazaa, he said.
Supernodes are machines that act as the backbone of p-to-p networks, with expendable bandwidth and processing power as well as consistent records of being online.
Under the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA) of 1998, copyright holders such as the RIAA can issue subpoenas directly to enforce their copyrights on the Internet.
Before the DMCA, only courts could issue subpoenas and strict conditions had to be met before a subpoena was issued. Now, in contrast, the RIAA only has to submit a two-page letter stating its “good faith belief” that its copyright is being violated to subpoena identifying information about an individual. No other evidence or proof of harm is required, von Lohmann said.
In June, Verizon Internet Services Inc. turned over the names of four alleged music downloaders after an appeals court denied the company’s request for a stay while it challenged the music industry’s right to subpoena the names.
In addition to the search tool, the EFF has also set up
a Web site along with the US Internet Industry Association and other organizations for individuals who need information on how to defend themselves from prosecution.
The EFF recommends that people who are worried about being targeted by the RIAA stop hosting files for uploading on P-to-P networks. Those who know they are being pursued should contact an attorney to discuss their options, von Lohmann said.