It works. Impressively well. With games, even. You can see our detailed test results below, but that’s PC World ’s first impression of Windows XP running under Apple’s
Boot Camp on our
20-inch iMac. And that’s more than you could say a couple of days ago about the promising-but-hacked-together
Eager to get our hands on a real, dual-booting Apple/Windows hybrid, we ran the Boot Camp installer on a 20-inch iMac and found the process amazingly smooth. It took about an hour. (You can download Boot Camp
here.) Graphics drivers—the major remaining performance hurdle under WinXPonMac—were solid and responsive under limited testing on our iMac.
Booting with Boot Camp
Boot Camp requires the latest version of Mac OS X (
OS X 10.4.6 ) and a firmware update (a very loud, un-Mac-like system beep is normal at the start of this process). Once you’ve properly updated your system, you can download, install, and run Boot Camp Assistant, which burns a CD of Windows drivers for you and walks you through the process of repartitioning your Mac and installing Windows XP.
I chose to give XP a 100GB partition and inserted my XP Service Pack 2 CD to begin the installation process. XP’s familiar, pixelated installation process went normally, and the Boot Camp manual provided intelligent directions about how to tell XP which partition to use and how to format that partition. (If you choose FAT instead of NTFS, you’ll be able to write files to the XP volume while you’re running Mac OS.)
On our iMac test machine, Boot Camp was endearingly smart about automating the series of required reboots to get you set up in XP. Once XP was set up to my satisfaction, I held down the Option key while rebooting and used the bootloader to hop back into OS X.
Once there, I used the Startup Disk preferences page that Boot Camp installs to ensure that XP was set as the default OS. Boot Camp installs a corresponding Control Panel app in Windows so you can change this setting in either OS.
No hitches so far
So far, working in Windows on the Intel-based iMac has come off without a hitch: If not for the slicker-looking hardware, I᾿d think I was working on a standard Windows PC with a wide-screen monitor. And that’s exactly what you’d want from a usable dual-boot system.
Firefox downloaded and installed flawlessly, and iTunes streamed songs easily from other PCs on the network. Both wired and wireless networking seemed fine. Little things, like the eject key on the Mac’s keyboard, worked without a hiccup. Even automatic driver updates downloaded and installed easily.
All in all, Boot Camp looks like an impressive effort from Apple. Over the next few days, we’ll continue to put our 20-inch iMac/Windows box through its paces and analyze how this new dual-boot option could affect the PC world.
Back in Windows, I got right down to business and installed a few games to put the graphics and sound support to the test. The quick and dirty verdict on performance? Most impressive. Doom 3 and Far Cry both ran smoothly with high-end graphics options turned on.
In both cases, I had to tweak visual settings manually, since the games automatically set themselves to very low settings. Far Cry, for example, autodetected very low settings, but it ran without a hitch when I bumped the resolution up to 1,280-by-720, with all visual quality options set to “High.”
Our 20-inch iMac came with a 2.0-GHz Core Duo processor, 1GB of RAM, and an ATI Radeon X1600 graphics card with 128MB of GDDR3 memory. That’s roughly equivalent to a high-end laptop machine, and anecdotally the performance I obtained was about what I’d have expected from that type of PC.
The first graphics test results are in for the 20-inch iMac, and Windows XP under Boot Camp continues to impress. In our Doom 3 and Far Cry benchmarks, the iMac ran neck and neck with a pair of notebook systems equipped with Intel Core Duo processors and similar graphics hardware.
Here’s a snapshot of the results in our tests without antialiasing.
PC World Boot Camp Graphics Tests
| ||Doom 3 ||Doom 3 ||Far Cry ||Far Cry |
| ||1,024-by-768 ||1,600-by-1,200 ||1,024-by-768 ||1,600-by-1,200 |
|iMac/2GHz Core Duo ||48 ||41 ||93 ||65 |
|HP Compaq nx9420/ 2.16GHz Core Duo ||44 ||37 ||92 ||62 |
|Acer TravelMate 8200/2GHz Core Duo || 56 || 47 || 101 || 77 |
|WinBook PowerSpec Extreme 9200/2.2GHzAthlon 64 X2 4200+ ||54 ||46 ||75 ||51 |
|CyberPower Media Center Ultra Edition/3GHz Pentium D 830 ||53 ||46 ||72 ||51 |
| ||>Better ||>Better ||>Better ||>Better |
Best results in bold.
Results are frames per second. All test systems featured 1GB of RAM, except for the Acer TravelMate 8200 and the WinBook PowerSpec Extreme 9200. Each system had its own graphics card—iMac: Radeon X1600 with 128MB of RAM; HP Compag nx9420: ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 with 256MB of RAM; Acer TravelMate 8200: ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 with 256MB of RAM; WinBook PowerSpec Extreme 9200: Nvidia GeForce 6600 with 256MB of RAM; CyberPower Media Center Ultra Edition: Nvidia GeForce 6600 with 256MB of RAM.—Testing courtesy of PC World.