In the continuing progression of wireless alphabet soup, 802.11n is the latest and greatest. In comparison to the ashes-in-your-mouth taste of 802.11g’s maximum throughput of 54Mbps, the delicious ‘n’ flavor offers up to
, which might be useful if you actually had an Internet connection that could offer that much speed. But—and I hate to be the bearer of bad news here—you probably don’t.
What does this mean for the peripheral makers? Take it away, Ars Technica:
Wireless products are certified for compatibility by the Wi-Fi Alliance…[f]or their part, the Wi-Fi Alliance is not pleased with the 802.11n swarm, and has threatened to give the boot to any manufacturers selling products claiming to be based on the standard. That hasn’t dampened enthusiasm, however, and it’s possible that the Wi-Fi Alliance’s ability to curb the situation will be negated by the fact that, well, almost everyone is doing it.
If I recall correctly, the exact same thing happened when 802.11g was coming out, and in the end it was no big deal, though at least a couple big players (Apple and Intel, for example) have been observing from the sidelines, no doubt ready to roll out their own solutions as soon as that standard is in the bank.
Note: When you purchase something after clicking links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. Read ouraffiliate link policyfor more details.